Questions arise about judicial complaints and selections

By Brad Iverson-Long
January 30th, 2010
The Idaho Supreme Court Building.
The Idaho Supreme Court Building.

A Senate confirmation to the state Judicial Council raised questions about how Idaho supports and chooses its judges.  The Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee unanimously approved the reappointment of J. Philip Reberger on Friday to the Judicial Council, which investigates complaints against judges and helps fill court vacancies.  At a Wednesday hearing, several lawmakers on the panel asked Reberger about the functions of the council and the court.  Reberger has served on the Judicial Council for the past six years.

Of concern to some lawmakers on the committee is that the Judicial Council has had to fill more court vacancies in recent years.  Judges on the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals stand for election every six years and district judges face election every four years.  Reberger said in the last four years the council has made recommendations for 23 vacancies when judges resign in the middle of a term.  Those recommendations go to Gov. Butch Otter, who makes a final selection.

“More and more of our judges are getting closer to retirement age,” Reberger told lawmakers.  He said judges also prefer to resign mid-term, knowing that a successor would be appointed rather than elected.

Minority Leader Kate Kelly, D-Boise, said the increase in appointments could be reducing voters’ choices.  “It seems to me that this trend is a deliberate part on the judiciary to circumvent election requirements,” she said.  She said many appointed judges run unopposed in elections.  “In Idaho we have a system of election of judges.  It sounds like maybe there’s a systematic increase of judges resigning or retiring mid-term.”

“This is not a new approach,” Reberger told Kelly.

The Judicial Council also manages citizens’ complaints of judicial misconduct.  Majority Leader Bart Davis, R-Twin Falls, asked Reberger why that complaint process is done in private.  “Sometimes I read in the newspaper or elsewhere that there is some sentiment that the Judicial Council is too secret,” Davis said.

“Without that confidentiality, the potential exists that immediate public outcry could run someone out on a rail without dealing with the substance properly,” Reberger said.  He said some of the complaints the council receives don’t have merit.  “If you were to air your dirty laundry in public prematurely, the confidence in Idaho’s judiciary could be undermined unnecessarily.”

Sen. Patti Anne Lodge, R-Huston, asked if the council helps new appointees adjust to the life and culture of being a judge.  “It’s a very lonely existence for judges,” Lodge said.  Her husband is a federal district judge.  “It’s kind of a life of isolation in many ways”

“That loneliness is something a judge has to assume when they put on the black robe,” Reberger said.  “Most applicants are prepared to tackle that burden and their colleagues are prepared to help them in that transition.”

Reberger also said that the council has had difficulty attracting candidates for openings in the Third Judicial District, which serves the Treasure Valley, because of the rising cost of living and flat salaries for judges.  “This session I don’t expect the Legislature to deal with judicial pay,” Reberger said, but said it should be a priority going forward.  The Idaho State Judiciary is requesting a 1 percent raise for judges in the next state budget, which would cost $185,300.  Gov. Otter doesn’t recommend that salary increase.  Idaho district court judges earned a salary of $112,000 in 2009, court of appeals judges $118,000 and supreme court justices $119,000.

Reberger’s appointment now heads for a full Senate vote.  The Judiciary and Rules Committee will vote next week on the appointment of Steven A. Tuft of Burley, who was selected by the Idaho State Bar.

3 Responses to “Questions arise about judicial complaints and selections”

  1. [...] The Idaho Senate approved Phil Reberger to a second six-year term on the Judicial Council Wednesday. Several senators had kind words for Reberger, who has also served under four Republican senators and Gov. Dirk Kempthorne. “This is the type of individual that Idaho is blessed to have,” said Senate Majority Leader Bart Davis, R-Idaho Falls. “He’s never really looked for work, but been sought out for his chosen leadership,” said Patti Anne Lodge, R-Huston, who is a childhood friend of Reberger. “I’ve known him a lifetime. I know his work ethic. He’s a good and honorable man.” The Senate also reappointed Tom Hearn to the Sexual Offender Classification Board. “His record of professionalism reads like a book,” Sen. Mike Jorgenson, R-Hayden Lake, said about Hearn. The full Senate will vote on the appointment of Steven Tuft to the Judicial Council later this week. The Judicial Council deals with complaints against state judges and helps the governor fill court vacancies. Read IdahoReporter’s past coverage of Reberger’s appointment. [...]

  2. Nancy Swan says:

    If the comment above by Reberger were valid, then the same protection of secrecy should extend to all who have cases before the court. “Without that confidentiality, the potential exists that immediate public outcry could run someone out on a rail without dealing with the substance properly,” Reberger said. He said some of the complaints the council receives don’t have merit. “If you were to air your dirty laundry in public prematurely, the confidence in Idaho’s judiciary could be undermined unnecessarily.”

    Secrecy is really a cover up for a judicial review system that protects judges rather than polices them. My complaint to the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance about the financial and personal relationship between my former attorney Paul Minor and Harrison County Circuit Court judge John Whitfield was dismissed. I refuse to comply with the confidentiality agreement and sparked a federal judicial bribery investigation that seven years later led to the conviction of Minor and Whitfield

    After my complaint was dismissed, I threatened to expose the failure the review board and the substance of my complaint. I discovered the mother of my former’s attorney’s law partner was on the board. It was a no-brainer to discover why the Commission dismissed my complaint. As a result of my protest both the judge and the Commission member resigned. I was told by the Commission director that judges are urged to resign to avoid tarnishing the judiciary. Rather than policing the judiciary they were more committed to protecting the image of the that state judges.

    See story about Toxic Justice, news, and resources at http://www.nancyswan.com and follow me at http://twitter.com/ToxicJustice

  3. [...] Council member Philip Reberger told an Idaho Senate panel earlier this year that keeping complaints confidential prevents needless public outcry about judges’ conduct.  [...]