<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Idaho lawyers rate Burdick higher than Bradbury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idahoreporter.com/2010/idaho-lawyers-rate-burdick-higher-than-bradbury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idahoreporter.com/2010/idaho-lawyers-rate-burdick-higher-than-bradbury/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court Endorsement</title>
		<link>http://www.idahoreporter.com/2010/idaho-lawyers-rate-burdick-higher-than-bradbury/comment-page-1/#comment-6334</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Endorsement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 03:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idahoreporter.com/?p=6631#comment-6334</guid>
		<description>[...] Justice Burdick has the endorsement of both the Republican and Democratic Party chairs and is higher rated as a judge by the state&#8217;s lawyers. In fact, Norm Semanko and Keith Roark are Co-Chairs of Burdick&#8217;s re-election [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Justice Burdick has the endorsement of both the Republican and Democratic Party chairs and is higher rated as a judge by the state&#8217;s lawyers. In fact, Norm Semanko and Keith Roark are Co-Chairs of Burdick&#8217;s re-election [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court candidates square off in televised debate &#171; Idaho Reporter</title>
		<link>http://www.idahoreporter.com/2010/idaho-lawyers-rate-burdick-higher-than-bradbury/comment-page-1/#comment-5748</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court candidates square off in televised debate &#171; Idaho Reporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 16:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idahoreporter.com/?p=6631#comment-5748</guid>
		<description>[...] said the survey of more than 600 lawyers by the Idaho State Bar isn’t a fair assessment of his work as a judge in north Idaho, since he said only seven lawyers practice before him and he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said the survey of more than 600 lawyers by the Idaho State Bar isn’t a fair assessment of his work as a judge in north Idaho, since he said only seven lawyers practice before him and he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stebbijo</title>
		<link>http://www.idahoreporter.com/2010/idaho-lawyers-rate-burdick-higher-than-bradbury/comment-page-1/#comment-5723</link>
		<dc:creator>stebbijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 05:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idahoreporter.com/?p=6631#comment-5723</guid>
		<description>Who paid for 4300 surveys to be sent out?

Well, someone needs to stir the pot, because if you don&#039;t the stew will burn!

I love the Stockholm Syndrome analogy. It is so Idaho. The Idaho Bar is dancing with their abusers because if they don&#039;t, they won&#039;t survive. The ones who speak out are abused some more. 

As an every day citizen, I saw this bar rating poll disclosure that suddenly appeared right before the debate as a really sleaszy political move. Maybe,the Courts/Media Judicial Committee Members should stay out of the political campaign process? Maybe Judge Burdick should address that issue in their next meeting that we really don&#039;t know if there is/will be one scheduled or not. 

For instance why isn&#039;t Brad Iverson-Long, who wrote this article on that committee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who paid for 4300 surveys to be sent out?</p>
<p>Well, someone needs to stir the pot, because if you don&#8217;t the stew will burn!</p>
<p>I love the Stockholm Syndrome analogy. It is so Idaho. The Idaho Bar is dancing with their abusers because if they don&#8217;t, they won&#8217;t survive. The ones who speak out are abused some more. </p>
<p>As an every day citizen, I saw this bar rating poll disclosure that suddenly appeared right before the debate as a really sleaszy political move. Maybe,the Courts/Media Judicial Committee Members should stay out of the political campaign process? Maybe Judge Burdick should address that issue in their next meeting that we really don&#8217;t know if there is/will be one scheduled or not. </p>
<p>For instance why isn&#8217;t Brad Iverson-Long, who wrote this article on that committee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Eugster</title>
		<link>http://www.idahoreporter.com/2010/idaho-lawyers-rate-burdick-higher-than-bradbury/comment-page-1/#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Eugster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idahoreporter.com/?p=6631#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>The bar poll is not surprising.  But before credibility should be given to it a few things should be understood.  Lawyers are very hidebound. They do not like to step out and speak their minds.  They love the status quo.  

Another point, these polls are only important if they are responded to by people who have actual experience with the particular person and if they themselves are competent.  Any one should question how many of the poll responders have any real knowledge of the judges in question.

Lawyers like to express warm feelings for those who have power over them.  It is a sort of hero worship, or worse, a desire to identify with the agressor.  Recall the Stockholm Syndrome.  One can imagine the warm feelings a lawyer had when he or she checked the box for a person tried and true as opposed to the box of a person from where was it Grangeville, Lewiston, someplace in the hustings.

The bottom line is this:  The Bar knows you will go with the poll.  The Bar loves its own.  The Bar does not like people who stir the pot, no matter how smart and decent and concerned the person is. 

This from a lawyer of 39 years experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bar poll is not surprising.  But before credibility should be given to it a few things should be understood.  Lawyers are very hidebound. They do not like to step out and speak their minds.  They love the status quo.  </p>
<p>Another point, these polls are only important if they are responded to by people who have actual experience with the particular person and if they themselves are competent.  Any one should question how many of the poll responders have any real knowledge of the judges in question.</p>
<p>Lawyers like to express warm feelings for those who have power over them.  It is a sort of hero worship, or worse, a desire to identify with the agressor.  Recall the Stockholm Syndrome.  One can imagine the warm feelings a lawyer had when he or she checked the box for a person tried and true as opposed to the box of a person from where was it Grangeville, Lewiston, someplace in the hustings.</p>
<p>The bottom line is this:  The Bar knows you will go with the poll.  The Bar loves its own.  The Bar does not like people who stir the pot, no matter how smart and decent and concerned the person is. </p>
<p>This from a lawyer of 39 years experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

